
Trump Administration Prepares Backup Tariff Strategy Ahead of Supreme Court Decision
The Trump White House is preparing alternative tariff plans as it awaits a crucial Supreme Court ruling that could overturn one of its key trade authorities. Sources familiar with the matter reveal that both the US Commerce Department and the Office of the US Trade Representative are studying fallback options to quickly reinstate tariffs if the Court invalidates the administration’s current approach.

Officials say the administration is examining tariff tools such as Section 301 and Section 122 of the Trade Act — both of which grant the president unilateral power to impose duties.
However, these mechanisms come with limitations, including slower implementation timelines and narrower authority, and they may also face fresh legal challenges.
Despite this, the administration appears determined to maintain strong tariff policies. President Trump has repeatedly urged the Supreme Court to uphold his emergency tariff powers, introduced under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
The Supreme Court could either uphold the tariffs, strike them down entirely, or issue a more limited ruling. A negative outcome would create uncertainty for businesses and global partners — and could force the government to refund more than $88 billion in collected duties.
Still, administration officials say tariff measures will remain central to Trump’s economic strategy regardless of the Court’s decision.

The legal clash revolves around Trump’s use of IEEPA to impose “reciprocal tariffs” on imports from around the world — as well as targeted duties on China, Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. These tariffs currently contribute to over half of the United States’ effective tariff rate, now estimated at 14.4%.
Experts expect that, if the Court strikes down IEEPA-based tariffs, the administration will look to rapidly reintroduce similar duties through alternative tools.
The administration has already launched a Section 301 investigation into Brazil, and still maintains Section 301 tariffs against Chinese goods from Trump’s first term. However, this route generally requires extensive investigations before duties can be applied.
National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett and other senior officials suggest that Sections 301, 122, or 232 could be used to rebuild the tariff system if IEEPA is ruled unconstitutional.

Section 122 allows tariffs up to 15% for a maximum of 150 days, but the narrow time limit makes it impractical for long-term trade strategy. Officials are exploring whether tariffs could be reset, canceled, or reapplied to work around this restriction — though such actions could trigger more legal disputes.
The administration has also expanded the use of Section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminum, autos, and other sectors. Some experts speculate that these growing investigations might be part of a broader backup plan if IEEPA powers are limited.
Another potential tool, Section 338, has never been used before and would almost certainly invite significant litigation. Analysts warn that a shift to alternative tariff measures could create administrative chaos and lead to months of uncertainty across global markets.
Still, senior White House officials maintain optimism that the Supreme Court may rule in their favor — and if not, they insist the administration already has the tools needed to rebuild the tariff system quickly.
Also Read : Trump Unveils $175 Billion ‘Golden Dome’ Missile Defense Shield with Space-Based Lasers
Pingback: China’s Trade Surplus Crosses $1 Trillion in 2024: How Weak Yuan and Global Demand Boosted Exports
Pingback: US Launches Airstrikes on Islamic State Militants in Northwestern Nigeria